amaure: (494)
Emet-Selch ([personal profile] amaure) wrote 2020-07-17 11:01 pm (UTC)

[Text]

[He waits for her to finish her thought, even with the incomplete text. He figures this must be something difficult, it's not like people just do that over nothing. And he would be right.

What an interesting situation.]


I see. Indeed, this is not a simple matter. Much do I know the existential dread that coincides with being among the living, what moral dilemmas our decisions and personal beliefs can inspire. A world like the one we are currently in certainly does just that.

Tell me, what would the opposite have achieved? You speak of it being better off for everyone, but what quantifies this better quality that your existence potentially hampered? And, if I may, while it might seem hard to do so, be objective with your answers. Perspective does have its place, but little does it when we speak of objective fact on a potentially grand scale.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting